Phatic Communication, or why the little things in social media really matter

I’m very pleased to say that my paper for The World Wide Web 2012 #WWW12 conference got accepted. It is on the phatic aspects of communication in an online sphere. Phatic communication expressions – a concept developed by the anthropologyst Malinowski and expanded on by the linguist Jakobson – denote brief, non dialogue and non-informational discussion or communication exchanges that can also be in the form of different types of signals.

However, in the paper I am arguing that the stuff you think is pointless and does not have a practical information value - your posts on Facebook and Twitter, the likes, the pokes and the tweets about food, weather, the mundane brief status updates – all turn out to have a vital role and social value  that even merits a new phrase – “phatic-posts”  - which the paper coins.

These phatic posts deliver values of staying up-to-date with a micro and macro world of events and news, flirting, chat and public expressions of everyday life and emotions among the participants. The paper explains multiple effects of phatic posts: social, validation, conflict-avoidance, and others. I won’t reveal everything now.

The paper will be published in the ACM SIG proceedings, and if you are curious this Wordle has a summary of the key words of the paper. I will be presenting this April at WWW12 in Lyon (thanks to DejanSEO who are covering my travel).

Check out the program for the conference, which includes a number of interesting events, keynotes, workshops, and discusssions. If you’re going to WWW12 please ping me as I would like to meet other researchers and authors (probably there will be 1500-2000 people and is hard to meet everyone and run from one track to the other) and it would be nice to meet up with other like-minded internet researchers, practitioners, academics, and business folks.

[note: check updates on the #WWW12 conference and paper presentation]

11 Comments »

  1. Pleased to see you’ve gotten into Roman Jakobson’s communications model! Jakobson’s definition of poetics [The projection of the principle of the paradigmatic axis onto the syntagmatic axis -- alternately, the projection of the principle of selection onto the axis of combination] is one of the more wonderful insights of the old Russian formalist/structuralist school. That’s really what I mean whenever I speak of the figurative aspects of communication — not simply metaphor, but a broader conception, including meter and alliteration, which can be defined structurally in terms of how they manifest themselves syntactically. I regard the phatic aspects of communication Danica’s referring to as the more purely “gestural” parts of speech that are keyed to the channel itself, though generally people tend to use the term as meaning talking about the connection, as in “Is this mike on?” — I like to think of it so generally as the structural functions of communication are phatic in nature, though I doubt Jakobson normally meant it that way.

    Comment by Seth Johnson — March 28, 2012 @ 1:22 pm
  2. [...] social and communication dynamics on social networks and media”. Read more on her blog here. Tweet The World Wide Web 2012 conference is hosted this year in Lyon, France, from [...]

  3. @Seth That was one of the goals of the work, the paper describes those structural functions of (online) communication that Jakobson has developed through the concept of the phatic function.

    Comment by Danica — April 6, 2012 @ 12:39 pm
  4. [...] and no particular concerns that any of them might be seen by strangers. She was engaging in what researcher Danica Radovanovic has called “phatic posts”, providing public context to her life with what seemed trivial information in the same way as a [...]

  5. [...] relationships, and for the sustainability of the social network systems. I wrote earlier about here, here (The Scientific American), and here. Other interesting papers on microposts, sentiment [...]

  6. [...] for online communities, human relationships and social networks (I have written about this subject here, here, and [...]

  7. [...] for online communities, human relationships and social networks (I have written about this subject here, here, [...]

  8. [...] updated reading on poking and phatic communication on social network sites from 2011 and 2012: Phatic Communication, or why the little things in social media really matter, WWW2012 and Phatic Posts: Even the Small Talk Can Be Big, and Small talk in the Digital Age: [...]

  9. Sounds great. Have you a link to the ACM DL page for this paper?

    Comment by Clare Hooper — December 27, 2012 @ 11:19 am
  10. Thank you! No, it’s not linked to ACM – but should be downloadable directly from CEUR – the permanent link is: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-838/paper_18.pdf
    Bibtex at http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-838/msm2012_proc.bib, if needed.

    Comment by Danica — January 9, 2013 @ 5:46 pm
  11. Comment by web page — February 11, 2013 @ 1:17 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.

All views expressed on this web site are those of Danica Radovanovic and do not necessarily reflect the views of any other entity, including current and former employers. All the opinions expressed are Danica's alone, and are not influenced by sponsorship.

Copyright 2006-2014 Danica Radovanovic
Danica Radovanović | Digital Serendipities | powered by WordPress with Barecity...en.